We've been writing about the lack of trend in the Major Indices and highlighting some relative strength in places like Software and Insurance, but overall signals remain mixed.
This morning I set out to write another post about areas showing relative strength, hoping to find a clean theme that the most actionable stock setups fit within.
What I found can be boiled down to the length of two tweets.
"Going through the S&P 1500 I see a number of actionable names on the long side, but they don't all fit a theme. They're all from different areas of the market. Where there are themes I see a lot of extended names and unattractive entries."
and
"I can see that the path of least resistance is higher in a lot of names, but that doesn't mean that current levels offer an attractive entry."
Wednesday's Mystery Chart is one of my favorite right now, so thank you everyone for your feedback and participation.
I received a lot of answers, but most of you were skeptical of the breakout and wanted to see more before getting involved. A few others wanted to be long with a tight stop and few, if any, were sellers.
With that as our backdrop, let's get into it.
The actual chart was the ratio of the Insurance subsector ($IAK) relative to the S&P 500, which is breaking out to 11-month highs as momentum gets overbought for the first time in nearly 2 years.
To me this looks like a textbook trend reversal, so while there may be some backing and filling over the near-term, Insurance stocks look set to outperform over the intermediate/long-term.
With the Chinese Internet Index closing at new 7-month highs this week, have we seen the move already, or are we just getting started?
One thing we know for sure by studying history is that stock prices trend. That's why Technical Analysis works. These tools help us identify those trends. Many academics will tell you that these consistent series of higher highs and higher lows over time are just random. The truth is you can show these charts to a 5 year old and the kid will tell you that yes, this stock is going up, or no this stock is going down. You can even argue that a trend is sideways, but that is trend recognition nonetheless.
It's very clear that markets trend, particularly stocks. They go up over time and they go down over time. A stock making new highs has a higher likelihood of continuing to make new highs vs turning around and beginning a new trend. An object in motion tends to stay in motion, is how Newton taught us. It's the same in stocks, which are driven by e-motion. (See what I did there?)
Canada, like a few other Major Indexes from around the globe, continues to churn around all-time highs. So which way will it resolve?
Let's go sector by sector and see what the weight of the evidence suggests, just like JC did for US Stocks.
First, let's start with the TSX Composite, which continues to hover near its 2018 highs as momentum diverges. After a ~20% rally off the December lows and the presence of a flat 200-day, it would be healthy to see some consolidation at current levels before breaking out
Sayings like these give journalists topics to write about. Pro tip: Most of the stuff you'll read is garbage.
“Sell in May and go away, and come back on St. Leger’s Day”
That's where all this Sell in May stuff came from in the first place. The inference here is that there is no point trading in the summer. All the brokers and fund managers will be out in the Hamptons working on their tans. The original saying suggests that the big boys won’t get back to business until Horse Racing season in England is over in the Fall. The British have been celebrating this day in September since the St. Leger Stakes, last leg of the English Triple Crown, was established in 1776. We Americans like to call this time of year, “Football Season”.
It's that time of the month again. This is when we take a step back, reevaluate everything we just saw the past 4 weeks or so, and come back home to the longer-term charts. Life is easier when we're not fighting big trends. While it's important for us to try and identify price levels that could act as support and resistance, this exercise is to determine whether these assets are going up, down or sideways.
Regardless of our time horizon, I think it's important to take these 30-60 minutes a month to acknowledge the bigger trends. Once this is done, then we can work our way down to weekly and daily charts for execution purposes. I say it all the time - My Monthly Candlestick Review is the most valuable 6-10 hours of work I put in each year.
While we wait to see whether or not this retest of all-time highs is a successful one, we want to define our risk on the long side in individual names that continue to lead the market higher.
One subsector that remains a consistent source of these setups is Software.
Below is a chart of Software relative to the Technology Sector overall, finding support right where it needed to at our previous price target. Whether prices can get back to their year-to-date highs will be an important tell, but for now the uptrend in this ratio remains strongly intact.
Interest Rates in the United States hit new 52-week lows last month. But from the looks of it, the commodities market and stock market are not in agreement with that direction. It's when we see divergences among asset classes that it gets my attention.
Today we're looking at the divergences between stocks, bonds and commodities that I believe are pointing to higher rates this quarter. If we're going to take the weight-of-the-evidence approach, it's 2 to 1 in favor of rising interest rates.
April 10th we looked for a bounce in Healthcare Providers and were early, so several of our trades were quickly stopped out and others didn't trigger at all. Medical Devices were the last subsector standing and once they were hit, we thought that Healthcare was likely close to a short-term bottom.
Given the extreme oversold readings we were seeing in our work (like percentage of XLV components hitting oversold conditions last week) and the subsequent bounce to start this week, I want to outline five names showing relative strength in the space that could benefit from continued mean-reversion in the sector.
More importantly, they offer well-defined risk and a reward/risk that's skewed in our favor.