This has been a pretty simple one coming into 2016. Not all charts are as clean as this, so it's hard for me to argue against selling Growth and buying Value. The longer-term trend has been to buy Growth stocks and sell Value stocks since 2006. This strategy has worked well, except maybe during 2012, but even that correction came within the context of a much larger bull market in Growth vs Value stocks.
Today we are looking at a ratio of the Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund vs the Russell 1000 Value Index Fund (IWF / IWD). This is a weekly line chart going back to the low in 2006 showing prices trending higher between 2 converging uptrend lines:
Dow Theory is something that gets thrown around a lot, usually irresponsibly. What I mean is, that there is a lot more to Dow Theory that what you normally hear about on the TV or read about on the Internets. Usually, conversations about Dow Theory revolve around the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Dow Jones Transportation Average either confirming or not confirming each other's trends. This is indeed part of Dow Theory, but not even in my top 5 most important Dow Theory Tenets. There are other aspects of Dow Theory that we need to pay attention to even more.
This doesn't have to be complicated guys. Supply and Demand dynamics do not change. I keep hearing how this market is "algo driven" or whatever, but those algos are built by humans. Supply and demand is based on fear and greed in humans, whether discretionary or systematic. I think the debate about algos is a waste of time for all of us. Let the noisemakers, who aren't trying to make money in the market, worry about that stuff. We're here to focus on supply and demand. Period.
The S&P500 has struggled over the past week to continue this monster rally from last month's lows. It should not be a surprise to anyone that we have struggled. Why? Because prices just ran into a ton of overhead supply. This correction is normal, and should be expected. Blame the algos if you want to sound smart in front of ignorant people at a cocktail party, but where I come from, we call this "normal":
Today is the 7th anniversary of the S&P500 closing low in March 2009. This date, March 9th, has gone down as the historic low in the stock market after the financial crisis of 2008. But the truth is that the market of stocks bottomed out well before that. Let's remember that the S&P500 is just 1 index with only 500 stocks. The majority of stocks had already bottomed by the time the S&P500 ultimately made its low towards the end of the 1st quarter of 2009.
During broad rallies in the equity markets, both in the US and globally, I look for those names / sectors / indices that are not participating to the upside, as those are normally the ones that lead to the downside once the market moves lower. One of the names that caught my eye during the rally off the February lows is Pfizer.
Before getting into the analysis of Pfizer, I think it's important to point out the weak relative performance of the sector it belongs to.
The roughly 5 year daily chart of the ratio XLV / SPY shows the under-performance that's been occurring in Healthcare stocks relative to the S&P 500 since mid-2015. Recently this ratio broke down below its primary uptrend line from the 2012 lows while momentum remains in a bearish range, suggesting that this under-performance is likely to continue.
Changes in trend rarely get cleaner and as well-defined as the distribution taking place in the semiconductor space. The infamous head and shoulders topping pattern is as clear as day in this one. Today we're looking at the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, which is the benchmark for semiconductors. This basket of chip stocks appears to be near a completion of a massive multi-year distribution pattern.
This is a weekly chart of semi's putting in their highs last summer to begin the right side of this topping pattern. This one fits the description
You guys who know me already understand why it is that I am constantly looking for whipsaws. The best risk vs reward opportunities are sparked from such events. We often refer to whipsaws as failed breakdowns or failed breakouts depending on the direction of the underlying trend. From failed moves come fast moves in the opposite direction, and that's why we look for them.
The idea behind support and resistance is that when markets meets resistance, or a level where supply exceeds demand, prices continue to fall from that price until eventually it breaks through it. Sometimes it tests resistance once or twice and sometimes 3 - 4 times, but the idea behind it remains the same. Once resistance has been broken
Regardless of how strong their brand may be, Disney continues to remain correlated to the S&P 500, as most stocks do during a bear market, and remains in a downtrend. Despite the neutral to bearish structural picture, the stock looks to be setting up for a tactical bounce in the coming weeks.
Structurally the stock remains range bound between 90 and the all-time highs at 122. During this recent selloff, prices retested the uptrend line from the 2009 lows, which also corresponded with the 38.2% retracement of the 2011-2015 rally. I don't believe in triple bottoms, and although this is the third time testing the $90 level, current evidence suggests the stock can stage a counter-trend rally before continuing to the downside.
