We've had some great trades come out of this small-cap-focused column since we launched it back in 2020 and started rotating it with our flagship bottom-up scan, Under the Hood.
For the first year or so, we focused only on Russell 2000 stocks with a market cap between $1 and $2B.
That was fun, but we wanted to branch out a bit and allow some new stocks to find their way onto our list.
We expanded our universe to include some mid-caps.
Nowadays, to make the cut for our Minor Leaguers list, a company must have a market cap between $1 and $4B.
And it doesn't have to be a Russell component — it can be any US-listed equity. With participation expanding around the globe, we want all those ADRs in our universe.
The same price and liquidity filters are applied. Then, as always, we sort by proximity to new...
I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again: I never really know which trades are going to be my biggest winners.
Sure, sometimes I get a setup that checks all the boxes:
Price action looks great
volume confirms
sentiment is lined up
and I feel like I’ve got a winner on my hands
But more often than not, those aren’t the trades that end up paying me the most.
The ones that really work? They usually sneak up on me. Quiet names. Unexpected moves. Ones I nearly talked myself out of. Which is why I’ve learned—through many hard lessons—to keep my size consistent.
This is one of the most important forms of discipline I’ve developed as a trader: Treating every trade the same.
Same sizing. Same process. Same rules.
Whether I’ve got massive conviction or mild curiosity, I try to keep the structure tight and the exposure sane.
Why? Because the alternative is a psychological nightmare.
If I go all-in on a trade I’ve hyped up in my head, and it turns out to be dead wrong? I don’t just lose money—I lose mental capital.
I then second-guess myself. I hesitate on the next trade. I spin into...
I've been loving how this boring utility space name has been consolidating near all-time highs since February. Most people have probably been bored to tears if they've been in it. Longs are comfortable, shorts are asleep. Great.
With earnings coming up later this month, I think we've got the catalyst we need to surprise people and see this stock breakout. I want to get a head start...
Welcome back for another Top Down Trade of the Week.
This is a classic leadership scan.
We start with the best sectors, then drill into the subgroups. We pick one, and then take a look at the top stocks in it.
This week’s standout is Materials, holding steady at the number four spot in our sector rankings.
It’s not the first time we’ve highlighted Materials since we began publishing this scan. Strength has been quietly building under the surface for a while now.
Just last week, $XLB posted its best relative performance versus the broader market in over five years.
I'm open to the idea of a big rotation into cyclicals in the back half of this year.
Here is a look at our overall industry rankings, which shows...
Metals are on the move this week — and in a big way.
Silver, Copper, Palladium, Platinum… All printing fresh breakouts at the same time.
Gold kicked things off last year. It’s been stair-stepping higher for months, leading the charge. But recently, it’s cooled off — and now the rest of the complex is following suit.
Silver’s breaking out from a massive base and pushing into territory we haven’t seen in over 13 years.
We think 50 is on the table — and it could get there fast.
Copper’s part of this conversation too. Always has been.
We don’t call it Dr. Copper for nothing — it’s a key read on growth and the global economy.
And this week? It just logged its best single-day gain in history.
Big moves like this usually mean one of two things: