Hourlies Are For Amateurs
- Posted by JC Parets
- on September 7th, 2012
Earlier today I walked into a buddy’s office to catch him looking at an hourly candlestick chart. I told him this nonsense needs to stop immediately.
My friend Brian Shannon over at alphatrends.net takes this stuff personally. And I love that about him. He wrote an awesome post on this very subject a couple years ago. Check it out:
“Look at the picture below and ask yourself ‘which one doesn’t belong?’ It is not a trick question… the lone apple is clearly different than the 6 oranges in the picture.”
“Multiple timeframe analysis allows us to better visualize and put into context the conflicting messages the market may be broadcasting. Let’s say you started your analysis on a daily timeframe and you wanted to take a deeper look at the market action, many people will look at an “hourly chart” or one where each data point (candle or bar) is equal to 60 minutes of trading. In my opinion this timeframe is a flawed timeframe to look at, especially if you add any indicators or oscillators to your analysis.
Here is why the 60 minute timeframe is flawed. Each day the equities markets are open from 9:30AM to 4:00PM Est. From the opening bell to the closing bell, the market is open for 390 minutes each day. If we are to divide a 60 minutes into 390 minutes you would get 6.5 periods. In other words, you would not have an equal amount of data in each bar or candle.
Another way to think about it is to recognize that the bars on an hourly chart are completed at the end of each hour, so the 9:30-10 timeframe would build one full candle on a sixty minute chart even though it only has 30 minutes of data… On a chart with 60 minute candles there would be seven candles for each day: six of them would be constructed with 60 minutes of data and one would be constructed with just 30 minutes. We would be comparing apples and oranges.
You may be thinking that it is not a big deal, but once you start adding basic technical tools, such as a moving average, you will recognize that the 30 minute timeframe having equal weight in the calculation of the average as the six- 60 minute periods doesn’t make sense. As we know, technical analysis is more art than science, but little subtleties like keeping our data consistent can make a difference. If we want a true “average” weight of a bunch of oranges, we cannot accurately determine it by averaging six oranges and one apple.
So here is the simple solution. Either switch your chart to a 65 minute timeframe so you have six candles of equal length each day (390/65 = 6.0) or further reduce your timeframe down to 30 minutes of data. With 30 minute data periods each day will have 13 individual candles of equal length.”
Full Disclosure: Nothing on this site should ever be considered to be advice, research or an invitation to buy or sell any securities, please see my Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.blog comments powered by Disqus
J.C. Parets is the Founder & President of Eagle Bay Capital, LLC. He earned the Chartered Market Technician designation (CMT) and is a member of the Market Technicians Association. More
- What To Get Your Chartist For The Holidays
- Weekends With Allstar and Pearlman
- Why Is It Always About What You’re Buying?
- Video: JC Parets Presents At Duke University
- The Three C’s of December Seasonality
- Investment Managers Are Leveraged Long
- Tom Fitzpatrick in NYC December 16th
- Weekends With Phil Pearlman & JC Parets
- The Difference Between Technician & Chartist
- Remember What This Is All About
Archive by Year